<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="../nsu_article.xsl"?><!DOCTYPE nsuarticle PUBLIC "-//NPG//DTD NSU//EN" "nsu_article.dtd"><nsuarticle type="news"><articleidlist><articleid type="uid">010301</articleid><storyno>-1</storyno><articleid type="doi">10.1038/nsu010301</articleid><storyno>-1</storyno></articleidlist><pubfm><confgrp color=""><confdate></confdate><confplace></confplace><conftitle></conftitle></confgrp><pubdate><dayofweek name="Thursday"></dayofweek><day>22</day><month>February</month><year>2001</year></pubdate><category>ecology &amp; evolution</category></pubfm><fm><title>Slashing and slicing</title><aug><fnm>Henry</fnm><snm>Gee</snm></aug><standfirst>Cutting-edge engineering design meets cutting edges of another kind - the slicing teeth of the dinosaur predator <emphasis>Allosaurus</emphasis>.</standfirst></fm><body><p><figure filename="dino_200.jpg" align="right"><caption>Allosaurus fragilis: it wasn't too fond of biting or chewing</caption></figure>A high-tech tool used by engineers to test the strength of bridges has taught researchers something about the violent eating habits of the Jurassic predator <latin>Allosaurus fragilis</latin>: it wasn't too fond of biting or chewing its food<bibr rid="b1">1</bibr>.</p><p>The size of <latin>Allosaurus's</latin> skull had been something of a conundrum for palaeontologists because -- compared with skulls of other Cretaceous carnivores such as <latin>Tyrannosaurus rex</latin> -- it seemed too robust considering the relative weakness of its bite. But after testing an <latin>Allosaurus</latin> skull using the engineering apparatus, Emily Rayfield of Britain's University of Cambridge and colleagues find that <latin>Allosaurus</latin> probably used its skull in a completely different way from its fellow predators.</p><p>The researchers used finite-element analysis (FEA), which is normally deployed to work out how stresses are distributed around a structure under various loads. For example, FEA might be used to see how a bridge design reacts to trucks of a certain weight moving across it.</p><p>In a similar way, Rayfield's team used FEA to study how the strong, lightly built skull of <latin>Allosaurus</latin> responded to stresses such as biting and shearing. It soon became apparent that the skull itself was immensely strong and would have been able to withstand very powerful impacts. But the teeth would not survived the very large compressive loads borne, for example, by the teeth of a much larger dinosaur such as <latin>T. rex</latin>.</p><p>Rayfield and colleagues think that the skull of <latin>Allosaurus</latin> wasn't over-engineered but designed with a different purpose in mind. <latin>Allosaurus</latin> was a pursuit predator that head-butted its prey (large, herbivorous dinosaurs) with great force. An analogy, the researchers say, is a man hitting a block of wood with a hatchet. Once impacted, the dinosaur would not bite straight down into its prey, but slash, slice and tear pieces of flesh before withdrawing. This kind of behaviour would put a premium on skull strength without requiring individual teeth to bite with comparable force.</p><p>This work makes for especially interesting reading when compared with earlier studies of <latin>T. rex</latin> bite forces. Palaeontologist Gregory Erickson and colleagues<bibr rid="b2">2</bibr> showed, using real bones and models of dinosaur teeth, that the bite of <latin>T. rex</latin> delivered a compressive load strong enough to bite through the bones of its adversary <latin>Triceratops</latin>. This could mean that <latin>T. rex</latin> had become a specialist in dismembering carcasses of large and perhaps heavily armoured dinosaurs.</p><p>Taken together, the work shows the kind of range in hunting strategies that one might have expected in a group of animals as large, diverse and successful as the dinosaurs.</p></body><bm><refgrp><bib id="b1" homeurl="http://www.nature.com/nature"><refau><snm>Rayfield</snm>, <fnm>E.</fnm> <inits>J.</inits></refau> et al. <atl>Cranial design and function in a large theropod dinosaur.</atl> <jtl>Nature</jtl> <vol>409</vol>, <spn>1033</spn><epn>1037</epn> <pubyear>2001</pubyear>.</bib><bib id="b2" homeurl="http://www.nature.com/nature"><refau><snm>Erickson</snm>, <fnm>G.</fnm> <inits>M.</inits></refau> et al. <atl>Bite-force estimation for Tyrannosaurus rex from tooth-marked bones.</atl> <jtl>Nature</jtl> <vol>382</vol>, <spn>706</spn><epn>708</epn> <pubyear>1996</pubyear>.</bib></refgrp></bm></nsuarticle>
