<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl"  href="../template.xsl"?><!DOCTYPE nsuarticle PUBLIC "-//NPG//DTD NSU//EN" "../nsu_article.dtd"><nsuarticle type="news">   <articleidlist> 	 <articleid type="uid">010628</articleid><storyno>-14</storyno> 	 <articleid type="doi">10.1038/nsu010628</articleid><storyno>-14</storyno>   </articleidlist>   <pubfm> 	 <confgrp color="none"><confdate>June,		  2001</confdate><confplace>Edinburgh</confplace><conftitle>Earth Systems		  Processes, Global Meeting</conftitle></confgrp> 	 <pubdate> 		<dayofweek name="Thursday"/> 		  <day>28</day> 		  <month>June</month> 		  <year>2001</year> 	 </pubdate> 	 <category>space</category>   </pubfm>   <fm> 	 <title>Chaos killed the dinosaurs</title> 	 <aug> 		<prefix></prefix> 		<fnm>Tom</fnm> 		<snm>Clarke</snm> 		<suffix></suffix> 	 </aug> 	 <keywdgrp> 		<keyword></keyword> 	 </keywdgrp> 	 <standfirst>Subtle shifts in the solar system could have caused the		dinosaur-devastating crash.</standfirst>   </fm>   <body> 	 <p>		<figure align="left" filename="dino_160.jpg">		  <caption>A subtle celestial wobble may have made a big impact on the			 dinosaurs</caption><source>© SPL</source>		</figure></p>	 <p>A bizarre wobble 65 million years ago, perturbing the orbits of Mars,		Earth and Mercury, may have caused the demise of the dinosaurs, new models of		the Solar System suggest. </p>	 <p>The celestial upset could have disrupted the trajectories of asteroids -		normally safely confined to asteroid belts -sending one or more careering into		the Earth. The proposed wobble coincides with the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T)		boundary, when an asteroid or comet is thought to have smashed into Earth,		exterminating the dinosaurs.</p>	 <p>"The ultimate cause of the K-T impact - and the demise of the dinosaurs		- may have been a chaos-induced change in Solar System dynamics,"		astrobiologist Bruce Runnegar of the University of California in Los Angeles		told the Earth Systems Processes Global Meeting in Edinburgh, Scotland,		yesterday.</p>	 <p>Runnegar's models suggest that the subtle shifts in orbits - which would		be too small to measure if they occurred today - emerged from the amplification		of tiny irregularities over time. "The chaotic nature of the system causes the		event," says Runnegar.</p>	 <p>Looking at ancient ocean sediments, Runnegar and his colleagues had		previously identified evidence of a 400,000-year cycle in the Earth's climate		that corresponded closely to natural fluctuations in its orbit. </p>	 <p>To understand how this cycle may have influenced Earth's climate during		the past 100 million years, the team constructed computer models based on		natural variations in planetary orbits, their proximity to the Sun and their		gravitational effects on one another.</p>	 <p>In each of the models, they found that the fluctuations of the Solar		System's dynamics remained constant going back to 65 million years ago. To		their surprise, the frequency of the orbits of the inner planets then suddenly		changed. </p>	 <p>"If the orbits of Mercury, Earth and Mars were being shaken up at this		time, maybe asteroids were being shaken up too," says Runnegard. This might		possibly send a previously benign asteroid hurtling towards Earth. </p>	 <p>The team's prime suspects are the Hungarias asteroids, whose behaviour		is governed by Mercury. Being one of the inner planets, Mercury's orbit would		have been affected. </p>	 <p>The researchers have put the known positions of Hungarias into their		models and are running them again to see if one asteroid gets flung to Earth.		The models can take six months to run, so the team are still waiting to see		what happens. </p>	 <p>"Last week we went back to the Triassic," says Runnegar. "We should know		what happened at the K-T boundary by Friday." </p>	 <p>"It's a beautiful theory," says Paul Olsen, who studies Solar		System-induced changes in Earth's climate at Columbia University in New York.		"But I don't know what to think about it." </p>	 <p>Runnegar's model, says Olsen, may be reflecting the "nitty-gritty" of		the complex mathematics used to extrapolate so far back in time rather than		what may have actually occurred. </p>	 <p>But by looking elsewhere for older geological evidence of fluctuations		in climate that may be due to the Solar System effects, it should be possible		to corroborate or kill the model. "There are very good tests for the		hypothesis," says Olsen.</p>   </body>   <bm> 	 <features><related_stories url="010125/010125-5">		  <title>Disasters reveal social secrets of the			 dead</title><pubdate><dayofweek name="Tuesday"/><day>23</day><month>January</month><year>2001</year></pubdate></related_stories><related_stories url="000413/000413-6">		  <title>O, for the wings of a			 dinosaur</title><pubdate><dayofweek name="Tuesday"/><day>11</day><month>April</month><year>2000</year></pubdate></related_stories><linkout><weblink		  url="http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/edinburgh/">Earth Systems Processes			 Global Meeting</weblink></linkout></features><pic_idea>dinosaurs?</pic_idea>   </bm> </nsuarticle> 
